News

New Mexico Governor Defends Temporary Ban On Carrying Guns In Albuquerque

new-mexico-governor-defends-temporary-ban-on-carrying-guns-in-albuquerque

In the wake of a recent surge in gun violence, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham has implemented a temporary ban on the open and concealed carry of firearms in Albuquerque. The decision, which has sparked controversy and raised concerns about constitutional rights, comes after the tragic shooting death of 11-year-old Froylan Villegas.

Key Takeaway

New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham defends her decision to temporarily ban the carrying of guns in public in Albuquerque. Citing a public health emergency and the duty to protect her constituents, the governor contends that not all constitutional rights are absolute. The ban has sparked controversy and legal challenges, with some law enforcement leaders refusing to enforce the order.

Addressing a Public Health Emergency

Governor Lujan Grisham issued the order on Friday, citing a public health emergency due to the alarming number of gun violence incidents in the city. She argues that as the governor, she has a duty to protect the people of her state, even if it means temporarily suspending certain constitutional rights.

The shooting death of Froylan Villegas, who was caught in the crossfire of a road rage incident, served as a tipping point for the governor’s decision. While many are outraged by the order, Governor Lujan Grisham explains that not every constitutional right is absolute and that she has the authority to take necessary steps to address a serious public health problem.

The Open-Carry Debate

New Mexico is generally an open-carry state, allowing individuals to carry pistols openly in most public areas. However, the governor’s temporary ban has stirred controversy due to its limitation on this right within Albuquerque. Critics argue that the order goes against the Constitution and infringes upon individual freedoms.

Penalties and Enforcement

During the 30-day ban, individuals found in violation may face civil penalties and fines of up to $5,000. However, some law enforcement leaders have publicly expressed their refusal to enforce the governor’s order. Additionally, legal challenges are anticipated to be filed in the coming days, further complicating the situation.