Blueface, the rapper known for his controversial behavior, is now attempting to deflect blame and avoid responsibility after a disturbing photo of his infant son’s genitals was posted from his social media account. In a desperate move, Blueface claims that his phone was stolen and his Twitter account was hacked, thus absolving himself of any wrongdoing.
Key Takeaway
Blueface claims that his phone was stolen and his Twitter account was hacked after a controversial photo of his infant son’s genitals was posted on his social media. However, many question the legitimacy of his excuse, as it is not uncommon for celebrities to use hacking as a means to deflect blame.
Questionable Excuse
As the controversy surrounding Blueface intensified, he took to Twitter to assert his innocence, asserting that his phone had been stolen and used against his will. However, this claim has been met with skepticism, as it is not uncommon for celebrities to use hacking as a scapegoat when facing backlash for their actions.
The Disturbing Post
The alleged hacker, who supposedly gained control of Blueface’s account, shared a lengthy rant about his newborn son and their medical struggles, including an alleged hernia. The post also expressed anger towards the child’s mother, Chrisean Rock, accusing her of neglecting the infant’s health by avoiding doctor visits.
Curiously, the hacker seemed to align with Blueface’s side of the argument, which raises suspicions about the authenticity of the hacking claim. It is highly unusual for a genuine hacker to advocate for the person they have targeted.
A Troubled Family Dynamic
The controversy surrounding Blueface and Chrisean Rock has been steadily escalating, with their family situation quickly deteriorating. Earlier, Chrisean was caught improperly holding their child at Walmart, causing further criticism and concern. The situation seems to be spiraling out of control.
Legal Ramifications
The public’s response to this incident has sparked debates about the legal consequences Blueface should face for posting a photo of his child’s genitals. The question of whether his actions constitute a violation of child privacy laws remains unanswered.
