University Of Pennsylvania President Resigns After ‘Genocide Of Jews’ Testimony


University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill has announced her resignation after a controversial testimony on the “genocide of Jews” and whether calling for it violates university rules. The decision, which was made public on Saturday, came directly from Penn itself, with a statement from a member of the Board of Trustees.

Key Takeaway

University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill has resigned following her equivocal response to a question about the “genocide of Jews” during a congressional hearing. The incident highlights the sensitive issue of free speech on college campuses and underscores the need for clear and unequivocal condemnation of hate speech.

The events leading up to Magill’s resignation unfolded during a tumultuous week on Capitol Hill, where Magill and two other Ivy League university presidents, from Harvard and MIT, faced tough questioning from lawmakers. The focus of the inquiry was the rise of antisemitism on college campuses following the October 7 terrorist attacks in Israel.

During the proceedings, Magill was asked by Republican Representative Elise Stefanik if calling for the genocide of Jews was a violation of Penn’s rules or code of conduct. Instead of providing a straightforward answer, Magill gave a qualified response, stating that it depended on the context. She went on to explain that if such speech turned into action, it could potentially be considered harassment. Stefanik pressed Magill for a clearer answer, but Magill continued to give conditional responses, leading to a heated exchange.

The incident quickly went viral, and Magill later issued an apology in a video posted on Penn’s social media pages. In the video, she unequivocally stated that calling for the genocide of Jews is a violation of the university’s policies, acknowledging that she should have been more clear from the beginning.

Many were shocked by Magill’s initial failure to condemn the call for genocide and align it with the university’s values. The incident raised questions about the context and nuances of student speech and protests on campus.

Furthermore, the issue was further explored in a conversation with an MIT free speech advocate, who provided a puzzling response when asked if the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) calling for the genocide of African-Americans on a college campus would elicit a similar response as calling for the genocide of Jews. It was revealed that the response would be different, although the reasons for this distinction remain unclear.

This controversy arises in the context of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, which has drawn attention to the situation and has prompted people across the country to take to the streets in support, predominantly for Palestine. However, certain rhetoric, particularly criticism of Zionism, has been criticized as antisemitic hate speech by some.